Les plus grands noms comme Christian Death, Bauhaus, Alien sex fiend, Mephisto Walz côtoient les inconnus et les raretés ainsi l'excellent 'Below' de Bell, book and candle qui troquera ensuite son gothic rock inquiétant pour un rock variété sans intérêt, 'Tigerlilly' de Beat Mistress alias Linda Le Sabre, batteuse et chanteuse des excellents et trop rares Deathride 69 ici présents avec leur classique 'State of decay' ou encore Seraphim Shock qui livrait ici son premier titre sur cd. On y trouve bien sûr des artistes américains et anglais mais également français, allemands, australiens, scandinaves, le choix est vaste. Là, en l'occurence avec cette compilation, on approche même de la grande classe 'Goth Box' ce n'est rien de moins que quatre cds groupant chacun près de quinze formations deathrock, gothic rock, batcave et autres. J'ai souvent dû répéter cette rengaine, Cleopatra, c'est le label capable du pire comme du meilleur. 15 The Last Dance: 'Do you believe in angels'.9 Red Lorry Yellow Lorry: 'Hand on heart'.8 Children on stun: 'Beginning of the end (7" version)'.7 Black tape for a blue girl: 'Across a thousand blades (90)'.5 Rosetta Stone: 'Six before dawn (96.6 before dawn)'.2 Christian Death: 'The angels (assassin mix)'.1 David J.: 'The enochian angel of the 7th Aethyr'.12 Nösferatü: 'The haunting (main mix)'.10 James Ray and the Performance: 'Mountain voices'. ![]() ![]() 9 Malaise: 'Walking through the wonderland'.6 Love is colder than death: 'The city in the sea'.1 The Damned: 'Dr.Jekyll & Mister Hyde'.11 Wreckage: 'Devil's little helper (Lucifer mix)'.8 Rose of Avalanche: 'Stick in the woods'.2 Alien Sex Fiend: 'Hurricane fighter plane.14 Meridian: 'Masquerade (possession mix)'.10 Executive Slacks: 'God on the tongue (Godmix).6 Corpus Delicti: 'Noxious (the demon's game)'.Put another way, the State met the trustworthiness prong of the corpus delicti rule. Thus, the court concluded, the State provided substantial independent evidence tending to establish the trustworthiness of the confession and the corpus delicti for robbery was established. a DNA test establishing Billy’s blood was on a jacket the defendant was wearing when arrested.a test confirming Billy’s blood was inside the car and.the recovery of a revolver with a single expended cartridge at the scene.the medical examiner’s determination that Billy died from a single gunshot wound to the head.Here, evidence establishing the reliability of the confession included, in part: The court of appeals disagreed, concluding that under the trustworthiness prong of the corpus delicti rule, “he State need only show corroborative evidence tending to establish the reliability of the confession-not the reliability of each part of the confession which incriminates the defendant.” (quotation omitted). Specifically, he asserted that the State failed to introduce evidence corroborating his assertion that he stole $104 from the victim, which was relevant to the robbery charge underpinning the felony-murder conviction. On appeal, the defendant argued that the trial court erred by denying his motion to dismiss the robbery charge because the State failed to establish the corpus delicti of that crime. The defendant was convicted of first-degree felony murder, with the robbery as the underlying felony. The defendant also said that he took the murder weapon from Billy’s home and that he stole $104 from Billy’s wallet, dragged Billy out of the car, and left to go to “the crackman’s house.” I told him to take me to Benson and uh, before we got to Benson, I told him I needed to get out and pee and when I got out, I acted like I peed, pulled a gun out of my pants, opened my door back up and shot him in the head. ![]() After the defendant was arrested on warrants for first-degree murder and robbery of victim Billy, he admitted the following to the police: Here’s how the corpus delicti issue played out in Messer. For now, let’s call this second way of satisfying the rule “the trustworthiness prong.” In Parker, the court adopted a new, broader standard providing that the evidence could either prove commission of the crime or corroborate the confession itself, establishing its trustworthiness. 222 (1985), the North Carolina Supreme Court relaxed that rule. As originally interpreted in North Carolina, the rule required some independent evidence of the crime itself-the body of the crime. Under the corpus delicti rule, the State may not rely solely on the extrajudicial confession of a defendant to obtain a conviction rather, the State must produce substantial independent corroborative evidence that supports the facts underlying the confession. Here’s a refresher and an update on the new case. That rule popped up in a recent court of appeals case, State v. A few years ago, I wrote a blog post ( here) about the corpus delicti rule.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |